Scholastic walks back controversial segregated collection of diverse titles

Across the nation, it’s time for the Scholastic Book Fair. The beloved and nostalgia-triggering event, where kids go and pick out an armful of books to take home, is held at 120,000 schools.

But this year, amid the increasingly common practice of book banning in schools and the inevitably contentious debates that stem from politically driven censorship efforts, controversy is looming heavily around the event. After deciding earlier that it would allow schools to opt in or out of a collection of diverse titles this year, Scholastic has now reversed that decision—announcing instead that it will discontinue its separate collection of books on race and gender after a fierce backlash to segregating the titles.

“I want to apologize on behalf of Scholastic,” Ellie Berger, president of Scholastic Trade Publishing, said in a recent letter to authors and illustrators. “Even if the decision was made with good intention, we understand now that it was a mistake to segregate diverse books in an elective case. We sincerely apologize to every author, illustrator, licensor, educator, librarian, parent, and reader who was hurt by our action.”

The collection of 64 books, called “Share Every Story, Celebrate Every Voice,” was at first made optional, meaning schools could opt out of showcasing the very diversity that the stories taught about or celebrated. Mostly, the books are about Black and brown communities, including titles such as I Color Myself Different by social rights activist and former NFL player Colin Kaepernick; Malala Yousafzai’s biography; and The ABCs of Black History.

The decision to give schools the option of leaving out certain books follows a growing trend of banning books and even entire curricula that seek to educate youth on Black history, civil rights, and LGBTQIA+ experiences. More than 30 states are prohibiting some stories about gender and race, up by 33% since last year.

Still, allowing schools to opt out of diversity didn’t sit well with those who stand against censoring what students read, or organizations that stand for free speech. “Sequestering books on these topics risks depriving students and families of books that speak to them,” PEN America said in a statement. “It will deny the opportunity for all students to encounter diverse stories that increase empathy, understanding, and reflect the range of human experiences and identities which are essential underpinnings of a pluralistic, democratic society.”

Many parents and creators agreed, and a petition of more than 1,500 authors and illustrators demanded Scholastic reverse the decision.While Scholastic wants diverse titles in schools, and even signed an open letter opposing the ban of stories about diverse populations, the organization was seen as bowing to pressure from conservative parents. It originally argued that it had little choice. “Because Scholastic Book Fairs are invited into schools, where books can be purchased by kids on their own, these laws create an almost impossible dilemma: back away from these titles or risk making teachers, librarians, and volunteers vulnerable to being fired, sued, or prosecuted,” Scholastic said in its original statement addressing the controversy.

In part, the group may have also been concerned about volunteer workers being harassed when parents didn’t agree with diverse books. The controversy seems to keep getting more contentious, too. Recently, a Georgia teacher was fired for reading aloud a book about gender identity. A growing number of public librarians, meanwhile, are resigning over the demand for censorship.

While Scholastic may be in the middle of a harrowing battle to educate the masses on diversity, this latest episode shows that tenacity in pushing those stories forward, and striving to give all students access to them, is needed more than ever.

https://www.fastcompany.com/90972746/scholastic-book-fair-controversy-diverse-titles-letter?partner=rss&utm_source=rss&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=rss+fastcompany&utm_content=rss

Erstellt 2y | 25.10.2023, 18:30:04


Melden Sie sich an, um einen Kommentar hinzuzufügen

Andere Beiträge in dieser Gruppe

The era of free AI scraping may be coming to an end

Ever since AI chatbots arrived, it feels as if the media has been on the losing end o

14.07.2025, 10:20:06 | Fast company - tech
5 work-from-home purchases worth splurging for

Aside from the obvious, one of the best parts of the work-from-home revolution is being able to outfit your workspace as you see fit.

And if you spend your days squinting at a tiny lapto

14.07.2025, 05:40:05 | Fast company - tech
A newly discovered exoplanet rekindles humanity’s oldest question: Are we alone?

Child psychologists tell us that around the age of five or six, children begin to seriously contemplate the world around them. It’s a glorious moment every parent recognizes—when young minds start

13.07.2025, 11:10:06 | Fast company - tech
How Watch Duty became a go-to app during natural disasters

During January’s unprecedented wildfires in Los Angeles, Watch Duty—a digital platform providing real-time fire data—became the go-to app for tracking the unfolding disaster and is credit

13.07.2025, 06:30:05 | Fast company - tech
Why the AI pin won’t be the next iPhone

One of the most frequent questions I’ve been getting from business execs lately is whether the

12.07.2025, 12:10:02 | Fast company - tech
Microsoft will soon delete your Authenticator passwords. Here are 3 password manager alternatives

Users of Microsoft apps are having a rough year. First, in May, the Windows maker

12.07.2025, 09:40:03 | Fast company - tech
Yahoo Creators platform hits record revenue as publisher bets big on influencer-led content

Yahoo’s bet on creator-led content appears to be paying off. Yahoo Creators, the media company’s publishing platform for creators, had its most lucrative month yet in June.

Launched in M

11.07.2025, 17:30:04 | Fast company - tech