Why it’s so challenging to deploy AI on space missions

Everything is more difficult in space, and learning software is no exception. But the pressure to push AI into everything can’t be denied. 

U.S. satellite operator Spire will work with Mission Control, a Canadian space software company, on a demo mission to launch in 2025 that will see a Spire-built Earth observation (EO) satellite use Mission Control machine learning models to perform analyses in orbit. 

Founded in 2015, Mission Control develops software for autonomous space operations. The company was among the first to deploy a deep-learning algorithm in Earth orbit, and the first to do so in lunar orbit during Ispace’s first attempt to land on the moon.

We caught up with Mission Control CTO Michele Faragalli to understand what the mission is set to prove. 

This interview has been condensed and edited for clarity. 

How does Mission Control fit into the world of AI development?

There [are] a lot of companies out there, especially terrestrial tech companies, that are really leading the way in terms of those [deep learning] models. But we have our own subset of challenges in space—you might have lower power avionics, and so you really have to look at tiny models. Using terrestrial software infrastructure and terrestrial computing technology is a very different type of problem than what we’re doing for very low-power processors that have to fit on a lunar micro rover or a CubeSat.

Why do spacecraft need advanced machine learning models?

The latency is so high, the bandwidth restrictions are so limited, and, frankly, costs are so prohibitive that you just need the spacecraft to do more on its own. Let’s say you’re monitoring a flood or wildfires. The speed of response could be enabled by your satellite processing the data collected immediately on board, rather than waiting for your satellite to pass and then downlinking that.

What makes using AI models in space such a challenge?

What we learned through these demonstration missions very quickly was that you can train these models before flight, but the reality is once you have them up in orbit or on the surface of the moon, the operating conditions are just completely different. . . . How do you train a computer vision model that needs to detect life on Mars, as a random example? You have to build synthetic data, or you have to go to analog sites on Earth. The reality is, it’s never going to be perfect. 

How do you try to solve that problem?

A big genesis for this project we’ve just announced with Spire is looking at, how do you handle the uncertainty of spaceflight? In terrestrial edge AI sectors, you would call on an MLOPs pipeline, a machine learning operations pipeline. How do you retrain those models using new data? How do you deploy them to the hardware, to the edge device, or, in this case, to the spacecraft, with an over-the-air software update, and then monitor that performance so you’re ensuring you’re maintaining that persistent performance of that asset? 

What else makes it challenging to deploy AI on space missions?

There’s just really no certification standard yet for this type of flight software. As an example, a space agency doing a Class A mission would likely not impose a requirement on using deep learning techniques, because there may or may not be a way in which they could validate that.

These are statistical approaches, right? They have a certain kind of statistical performance output, 90% accuracy. So say you have a 90% accuracy, one of the challenges is you don’t know when it won’t perform. It’s not a physics-based problem that you can validate when it’s going to fail, and that’s a challenge for trusting these algorithms to perform under any operating conditions.

<hr class=“wp-block-separator is-style-wide”/>

This story originally appeared on Payload and is republished here with permission.

https://www.fastcompany.com/91214275/why-its-so-challenging-to-deploy-ai-on-space-missions?partner=rss&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=rss+fastcompany&amp;utm_content=rss

Creado 8mo | 23 oct 2024, 5:20:14


Inicia sesión para agregar comentarios

Otros mensajes en este grupo.

Compass’s lawsuit against Zillow highlights the growing power struggle in online real estate

Two of the nation’s real estate titans are on a collision course.

Compass, one of the largest brokerage

23 jun 2025, 20:30:07 | Fast company - tech
This Perplexity cofounder wants to help AI breakthroughs graduate from university labs

A team of prominent AI researchers, led by Databricks and Perplexity cofounder Andy Konwinski, has launched Laude Institute, a new nonprofit that helps univers

23 jun 2025, 18:20:04 | Fast company - tech
MrBeast used AI to create YouTube thumbnails. People weren’t pleased

YouTube star Jimmy Donaldson—aka MrBeast—is the face of the online video-sharing platform. He tops the platform’s most-subscribed list, with more than 400 million people following his exploits. On

23 jun 2025, 18:20:02 | Fast company - tech
The internet of agents is rising fast, and publishers are nowhere near ready

Imagine you owned a bookstore. Most of your revenue depends on customers coming in and buying books, so you set up dif

23 jun 2025, 11:20:07 | Fast company - tech
How ‘Subway Surfers’ has dominated mobile gaming for over a decade

For 13 years, Subway Surfers’ download rate has been consistent: about one million new installs every single day. 

Half of those downloads come from users upgrading to new

23 jun 2025, 11:20:06 | Fast company - tech
A new Roblox study shows how longer suspensions help curb bad behavior on platforms

Misbehavior on digital platforms can be tricky to manage. Issue warnings, and you risk not deterring bad behavior. Block too readily, and you might drive away your user base and open yourself to a

23 jun 2025, 11:20:04 | Fast company - tech