“I hypothetically was just offered a lot of money to endorse a political party. Like, millions,” internet personality Tana Mongeau told her podcast co-host last month. “Then I was being allegedly told an alleged list of other influencers that have already hypothetically accepted money to do those hypothetical things that were hypothetically offered to me to hypothetically do.”
Influencers and internet personalities are being paid on behalf of groups backing Vice President Kamala Harris or former president Donald Trump to court your vote. These content creators, whose regular programming includes posting prank and makeup looks, are instead cashing in on thousands—or sometimes millions—for a single TikTok or Instagram post. Mongeau added, “It’s not one or two. It’s hundreds. It’s allegedly, like, both political parties, that’s the thing.”
During the course of the 2024 election campaign, both parties have indeed increasingly turned to podcasters, influencers, and other internet personalities to try and meet their huge, engaged followings where they are at. “There are only 22 days more to vote, so, like, seriously, go vote,” influencer Mikey Angelo said in a recent Instagram video to his 744,000 followers. In the caption it clearly notes that Angelo was paid by a Democratic political action committee for the post—a fact he didn’t legally have to disclose.
Unlike political ads that run on TV or the non-political #sponcon that makes up much of influencers’ feed, content creators are not legally required to disclose if they’ve been paid to endorse a candidate on their page, the Federal Election Commission determined earlier this year. While exact numbers vary based on size of following and engagement, People First, a firm hired by the Harris campaign, has paid influencers anywhere from $200 to $100,000 for political posts this year, according to the Washington Post.
With more Americans regularly getting their news from TikTok and those under 30 nearly as likely to trust information from social media as from national news outlets, this lack of transparency further muddies the plenty-muddy waters of political advertising.
Earlier this year, the progressive nonprofit Brennan Center for Justice called on the Federal Election Commission (FEC) to ensure that communications from paid influencers contain disclaimers so that voters know who paid for them. However, critics have concerns that new restrictions on influencers could limit their right to free speech online.
Ultimately, the FEC decided that while campaigns do need to disclose when they pay social media companies to promote an influencer’s post to a broader audience, there is no federal requirement for influencers to disclose whether or not they were paid. Next time you see your favorite influencer making a sharp 180 to political content, take what they say with a grain of salt.
Inicia sesión para agregar comentarios
Otros mensajes en este grupo.


Look, I’m not gonna lie to ya’: I’ve got a bit of a love-hate relationship with PDFs. And, more often than not, it veers mostly toward the “hate” side of that spectrum.
Don’t get m

When the U.S. government signs contracts with private technology companies, the fine print rarely reaches the public. Palantir Technologies, however, has at

Bad news for morning routines everywhere: The New York Times has put its Mini Crossword behind a paywall.
On Tuesday, instead of their usual puzzle, players were met with a paywall. The

China’s Alibaba has developed a new chip that is more versatile than its older chips and is meant to serve a broader range of

Mount Fuji hasn’t erupted since 1707. But for Volcanic Disaster Preparedness Day, Japanes

When an influencer gets married, it’s safe to assume much of the cost, from venue decor to personalized invitations, has been comped in exchange for content. Now brides with smaller, more modest f