I've always found it cool to be in roles where I can help a younger generation learn skills to have a bright future. That role is something I do in a few ways (as a parent, robotics mentor, school board advisor and Sunday school teacher) and I suspect most HN readers share the same role and appreciation. And for developing software skills, it was obvious that both the students and I had to have a productive software environment where we could work together. That theme of experienced/inexperienced engineers working together is the context in which I created `dk` as a scripting tool.
My testing ground has been students with one or two AP CS courses (high school computer science in the US), some of whom interned with me. I had to tackle a few problems:
- The development environment had to be simple to setup and the programming language couldn't be complicated - The recognition that writing small, easily testable units of work (ex. "scripts") has been the only way I've found for very junior programmers to develop a large application - Cheap, locked-down development hardware (ex. school computers with limited RAM and no Administrator privileges) is sometimes used for deployment to cheap hardware targets (ex. hand-me-down Android tablets)
My solution was to write a standalone binary called `dk` that uses scripts as the atom of work, cross-compiles to standalone executables, and downloads the runtimes and sysroots it needs on-demand. It sits roughly in the same space as Python and Go.
`dk` is available for Windows, macOS and Linux/glibc host machines with a growing list of cross-compilation targets. Your `dk` scripts are written in an almost complete subset of OCaml 4: all `dk` scripts are OCaml, but not all OCaml code can run in `dk`. The other differences from conventional OCaml are that `dk` comes with a large library included, and that I treat any feature as buggy if the feature does not work on all supported OS-es.
The above origin of `dk` is admittedly odd (and abbreviated), so I was not expecting that `dk` would now be a general-purpose scripting tool. Yet it is. I can wrap, re-use and organize most of my hand-written software as a set of `dk` scripts.
Fair warning: The cross-compilation support in `dk` has had a recent overhaul and not every bug is closed. The error messages suck (you have to scroll up to see the root cause and resolution) but they will improve. Some progress bars are missing. There are also a few experimental features ... `uv`-style imports and an interactive interpreter are the big ones ... which are purposely under-documented because I am worried about `dk`'s API surface.
But it still works well, and you can see some real applications in the Examples section. I'd love if you could give it a kick in the tires and give `dk` some feedback! The issue list is at https://github.com/diskuv/dk/issues>.
Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44290121
Points: 3
# Comments: 0
Inicia sesión para agregar comentarios
Otros mensajes en este grupo.

Article URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.01963
Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.c
Article URL: https://graydon2.dreamwidth.org/317484.html
Comments URL: http
I was looking for a tiny library to easily transform both 2D & 3D objects with simple mouse / touch controls and a fixed camera, in the browser.
Like a simple 3D editor but without requiring the
A terminal-based web browser in Nim.[1] Has acceptable (YMMV) CSS rendering, some JS support, and inline images (sixel/kitty). It can also use various protocols other than http(s) such as (s)ftp
