Can anyone help me understand the economics of video streaming platforms?
Streaming, encoding, and storage demands enormous costs -- especially at scale (e.g., on average each 4k video with close to 1 million views). Yet YouTube seems to charge no money for it.
I know advertisements are a thing for YT, but is it enough?
If tomorrow I want to start a platform that is supported with Advert revenues, I know I will likely fail. However, maybe at YT scale (or more specifically Google Advert scale) the economics works?
ps: I would like this discussion to focus on the absolute necessary elements (e.g., storing, encoding, streaming) and not on other factors contributing to latency/cost like running view count algorithms.
Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40408515
Points: 10
# Comments: 3
Login to add comment
Other posts in this group
Article URL: https://www.token.security/blog/azures-role
Article URL: https://blog.mgdproductions.com/ikko-activebuds/
Article URL: https://double.finance/blog/wind_down
Comments URL: https://news.yco
