Sandisk Extreme Pro SSD with USB4 review: Style and good performance — when it connects at full speed

The Sandisk Extreme Pro SSD with USB4 is a handsome, rugged, relatively affordable external SSD with 40Gbps aspirations. We say aspirations, as several times it connected at only 10Gbps or 5Gbps on our test bed. Even when connected at 40Gbps, it was slower than the competition.

What are the Sandisk Extreme Pro SSD with USB4’s features?

The Sandisk Extreme Pro SSD with USB4 is noticeably larger than the older Extreme Pro SSDs, though it mimics them absolutely in shape, style, and color. The drive is a rather hefty 5.4–inches long, by 2.2–inches wide, by 0.45-inches thick, and weighs around 5.4 ounces. Lest you mistake my intent, I like solid and hefty in an external SSD.

As you can see below, it’s Sandisks favorite dark gray with copper highlighting in the extra large lanyard opening. It’s largely covering in textured siliconec which provides a nice, comfortable grip.

Obviously, the Sandisk Extreme Pro SSD with USB4 uses the USB4 protocol and it’s of the high-end 40Gbps variety. USB4 does allow 20Gbps implementations though we haven’t seen any. USB4 v2 will implement 80Gbps like Thunderbolt 5, but SSDs feature that are a ways off. Thunderbolt 5 SSDs can be counted with the fingers on one hand at the moment.

Sandisk warranties the Extreme Pro SSD with USB4 for a full five years, though that’s mitigated by TBW. Sandisk didn’t say that, but we’re assuming that’s a condition, along with dropping it from a skyscraper, splitting it with an axe, etc. As the write speed only dropped to 550MBps off secondary cache, we’re assuming TLC, which is normally rated at 600TBW per terabyte of capacity.

How much is the Sandisk Extreme Pro SSD with USB4?

The Sandisk Extreme Pro SSD with USB4 is available in a 2TB model for $280 and a 4TB model for $430. That’s in line with the pre-populated competition such as Adata’s SE920 and OWC 1M2, but not nearly the bargain that is the Corsair EX400U.

You can also roll your own for considerably less with something like the Ugreen CM642. But of course, you have the bother of opening and installing the SSD. In total, price is not an issue with the Extreme SSD Pro SSD with USB4 (Geez, I’m getting tired of typing that!). But there were issues.

How fast is the Sandisk Extreme Pro SSD with USB4?

When it operated at full speed, the Extreme Pro SSD with USB4 drive was fast, albeit not as fast as the competition — it placed last among some very fast USB4 SSDs. In our real world transfer tests, it also fell behind a couple of 20Gbps SSDs. Additionally, it had issues connecting at full speed on our test bed.

Using the supplied cable (40Gbps logo’d) the Extreme Pro SSD with USB4 operated at only 10Gbps on one of our test bed’s Thunderbolt 4 ports, and 5Gbps on the other. Windows also warned that the drive might not perform as USB4 should. Using the same cable on an M4 Mac Studio’s Thunderbolt 5 port gave the full 40Gbps.

Using a super high-quality Thunderbolt 5 cable, the Extreme Pro SSD with USB4 was able to perform and complete testing at 40Gbps on the PCWorld test bed. However, a second attempt with the same Thunderbolt 5 cable produced the reduced speeds.

Note that USB4 (an marriage of Thunderbolt 4 and USB) is still in its infancy, so interoperability issues aren’t startling, though these are the first we’ve experienced. The drive might perform substantially better and connect more reliably on other systems. It did on my Mac Studio.

It might be incompatibility with our test bed’s Thunderbolt 4 implementation, but we’ve never seen this from any other USB4 product. It might be Sandisk’s hand-shaking or thermal management that’s amiss. I asked both Sandisk and all the Thunderbolt/USB4 folk I know about the issue, but had not heard back as of this writing.

When connected at the full 40Gbps, you can see that the Sandisk Extreme Pro with USB4 was largely in tune with, if not quite up to the competition in CrystalDiskMark 8’s sequential tests.

The major weakness was in single queue/thread writing, which is the way Windows operates, These weakness showed up on other tests.

In CrystalDiskMark 8’s random 4K tests, the Extreme Pro SSD with USB4 was again, largely up to snuff with the competition, except for the very disappointing single thread write score. There’s a theme here.

We repeated the single queue, single thread test several times to make sure it wasn’t an aberration. It might have something to do with secondary cache management as the score doubled when we ran it on its own,. However, 40MBps is still considerably slower than the competition.

Again, Windows only uses a single queue and thread (despite NVMe being a decade old now) for writing data so it’s not surprising that the Extreme Pro SSD with USB was off the pace. It was actually slower in this test than several 20Gbps USB 3.2×2 SSDs.

While not tragic, the Sandisk Extreme Pro with USB4’s 450GB write performance was middling at best. Close to three minutes slower than the SE920 and again, slower than several 20Gbps SSDs.

We were a bit surprised that Sandisk didn’t pull more speed out of this unit. But the company isn’t quite as good with external SSDs as it is with internal ones. And this is not the first Sandisk SSD to have connection issues.

Note that most SSDs are capable of their advertised speed — on certain systems. AMD’s Thunderbolt 4 implementation is faster than Intel’s. Our test bed is Intel, which we’ve kept static over more than 100 external and internal SSD tests. All the drives we’ve tested have had the same “handicap”.

Should I buy the Sandisk Extreme Pro with USB4?

The Extreme Pro SSD with USB4 is handsome, rugged, feels great in your mitts, is decently affordable for USB4, and is faster than the majority of USB 3.2×2 20Gbps SSDs.

That said, the connection issues are a red flag, and the 40Gbps competition is faster. Wait for the second revision on this one. We’ll revisit this review if and when the issue is resolved, or Sandisk sends us a better-behaved replacement unit.

How we test

Our storage tests currently utilize Windows 11 (22H2) 64-bit running on a Z790 (PCIe 5.0) motherboard/i5-12400 CPU combo with two Kingston Fury 32GB DDR5 modules (64GB of memory total). Intel integrated graphics are used. The 48GB transfer tests utilize an ImDisk RAM disk taking up 58GB of the 64GB total memory. The 450GB file is transferred from a Samsung 990 Pro 2TB, which also contains the operating system.

Each test is performed on a newly formatted and TRIM’d drive so the results are optimal. Note that as any drive fills up, performance will decrease due to less NAND for secondary caching, and other factors.

The performance numbers shown apply only to the drive we were shipped as well as the capacity tested. SSD performance can vary by capacity due to more or fewer chips to read/write across and the amount of NAND available for secondary caching (writing TLC/QLC as SLC). Vendors also occasionally swap components. If you ever notice a large discrepancy between the performance you experience and that which we report (systems being roughly equal), by all means—let us know.