California’s new AI deepfakes law gets blocked by a federal judge. Here’s why

A new California law allowing any person to sue for damages over election deepfakes has been put on pause after a federal judge granted a preliminary injunction Wednesday blocking it.

U.S. District Judge John A. Mendez said artificial intelligence and deepfakes pose significant risks, but he ruled that the law likely violates the First Amendment.

“Most of AB 2839 acts as a hammer instead of a scalpel, serving as a blunt tool that hinders humorous expression and unconstitutionally stifles the free and unfettered exchange of ideas which is so vital to American democratic debate,” Mendez wrote.

The law took effect immediately after Gov. Gavin Newsom signed it last month. The Democrat signed two other bills at the time aimed at cracking down on the use of artificial intelligence to create false images or videos in political ads ahead of the 2024 election. They are among the toughest laws of their kind in the nation.

Izzy Gardon, a spokesperson for Newsom, said the laws protect democracy and preserve free speech.

“We’re confident the courts will uphold the state’s ability to regulate these types of dangerous and misleading deepfakes,” he said in a statement. “Satire remains alive and well in California — even for those who miss the punchline.”

But a lawyer representing YouTuber Christopher Kohls, who sued state officials over the law, called the ruling “straightforward.”

“We are gratified that the district court agreed with our analysis that new technologies do not change the principles behind First Amendment protections,” attorney Theodore Frank said.

The law was also unpopular among First Amendment experts, who urged Newsom last month to veto the measure. They argued that the law is unconstitutional and a government overreach.

“If something is truly defamatory, there’s a whole body of law and established legal standards for how to prove a claim for defamation consistent with the First Amendment,” David Loy, legal director of the First Amendment Coalition, said in an interview in September. “The government is not free to create new categories of speech outside the First Amendment.”

https://www.fastcompany.com/91202581/californias-new-ai-deepfakes-law-blocked-federal-judge-heres-why?partner=rss&utm_source=rss&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=rss+fastcompany&utm_content=rss

Établi 11mo | 3 oct. 2024, 16:50:16


Connectez-vous pour ajouter un commentaire

Autres messages de ce groupe

Smarter AI is supercharging battery innovation 

The global race for better batteries has never been more intense. Electric vehicles, drones, and next-generation aircraft all depend on high-performance energy storage—yet the traditiona

24 août 2025, 11:40:14 | Fast company - tech
AI passed the aesthetic Turing Test, raising big questions for art

Pick up an August 2025 issue of Vogue, and you’ll come across an advertisement for the brand Guess featur

24 août 2025, 09:20:14 | Fast company - tech
This word-search website is the brain boost you never knew you needed

Language is the original technology, the tool we’ve all used to coordinate with each other for thousands of years. Our success in life—both professionally and in relationships—depends on it.

24 août 2025, 00:10:13 | Fast company - tech
Dropbox Passwords is shutting down. Do this before your passwords are deleted for good

It’s been a bad year for password managers. First, Microsoft announced earlier this summer that its popular Microsoft Authenticator app would be

23 août 2025, 10:10:09 | Fast company - tech
The TikTok dorm water panic is officially here

Instead of worrying about making friends or keeping up with their studies, new college students have a different concern on their minds: dorm water.

“Praying dorm water doesn’t ruin my h

22 août 2025, 20:20:07 | Fast company - tech
Reddit—and a dash of AI—do what Google and ChatGPT can’t

Hello, everyone, and thanks once again for reading Fast Company’s Plugged In.

For years, some of the world’s most

22 août 2025, 20:20:06 | Fast company - tech