Joe Biden’s new chip export rules strangle competition to ensure U.S. AI supremacy

America, a country built on the principle of free markets, has decided to shut off around 120 countries from accessing the most valuable element that is powering the free market at present. But the United States has a global dominance in the fast-moving world of AI to defend—and that apparently means some core principles of the country can be compromised.

That’s the only way to react to the news that the U.S. government is proposing further constraints on the export of AI chips. Previously, such export bans have targeted China, which sits second in most global rankings of AI supremacy, behind the U.S.

Banning a rival like China from accessing American-made-or-supported AI chips makes sense, given how integral AI will be to shaping our future. (Indeed, China’s attempts to evade preexisting sanctions suggest President Xi Jinping will stop at nothing to acquire our best tech—so it’s only natural to put blocks and bars in place to make it more difficult.

The hurdles being placed on the 120 other countries by outgoing President Joe Biden are more difficult to explain. Putting blocks on Russia, Iran, and North Korea: sure. But making Israel, Singapore, and Saudi Arabia jump through hoops in order to access AI chips seems less like protecting the future of the country, and more like an overtly protectionist trade policy. Those countries will have to be granted the ability to purchase a capped number of chips from companies, which will be predicated on them proving to the U.S. that they meet security requirements. (Eighteen of the U.S.’s top allies won’t face such restrictions and will have carte blanche to buy as many high-tech GPUs—the computer chips that are powering the AI revolution—as they wish.)

Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo isn’t exactly hiding the government’s intentions. “The U.S. leads AI now—both AI development and AI chip design—and it’s critical that we keep it that way,” she said in a statement. But what exactly are midsized countries going to do to threaten U.S. supremacy in this space anyway?

Putting complicated requirements in place that those world leaders will have to adhere to to access our chips is likely to have the opposite effect the government claims to have intended. The White House has said that it’s necessary to regulate chip exports as you would arms exports because of the risk that a rival like China might rise up and supplant the U.S. as the top tech power. But rest assured, when confronted with a convoluted check-box exercise chock-full of acronyms (countries have to obtain National Verified End User status) and a multiple-tier system, it’s more likely countries will look towards China for cheaper, look-alike chips to power their AI models.

We shouldn’t be surprised by this decision. Despite Biden’s more muscular approach to tech regulation than his Republican predecessor (and successor), the reality is that the U.S. has been served pretty well over the past 20 years by companies headquartered in its country. It’s arguably why the Biden administration has continued its war on TikTok, a rare success story that didn’t emanate from Silicon Valley.

But while some world leaders may say that a ban against TikTok doesn’t matter to them, limiting access to the fuel of future economies does. Rather than trying to prevent China from competing on even footing, it’s preventing everyone else from doing so.

https://www.fastcompany.com/91259603/joe-bidens-new-chip-export-rules-strangle-competition-to-ensure-u-s-ai-supremacy?partner=rss&utm_source=rss&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=rss+fastcompany&utm_content=rss

Létrehozva 4mo | 2025. jan. 13. 19:50:02


Jelentkezéshez jelentkezzen be

EGYÉB POSTS Ebben a csoportban

These 5 free AI-powered Chrome extensions make Gmail so much better

Email: It’s one of the more evil of the necessary evils. We all spend a significant chunk of our days wading through messages, to the point that it can feel like a never-ending task. Save us, arti

2025. máj. 12. 6:20:05 | Fast company - tech
30 years ago, ‘Hackers’ and ‘The Net’ predicted the possibilities—and horrors—of internet life

Getting an email in the mid-’90s was kind of an event—somewhere between hearing an unexpected knock at the door and walking into your own surprise party. The white-hot novelty of electronic mail i

2025. máj. 11. 11:40:05 | Fast company - tech
Uber is hedging its bets when it comes to robotaxis

Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi is enthusiastic about the company’s pilot with Waymo. In

2025. máj. 10. 14:50:05 | Fast company - tech
Apple may radically change its iPhone release schedule. Here are 3 business-boosting reasons why

For well over a decade now, consumers have been used to new iPhones coming out in the fall, like clockwork. However, according to a series of reports, Apple may be planning to change its iPhone re

2025. máj. 10. 10:20:04 | Fast company - tech
How Google can save you money the next time you book travel

Booking travel has become a bit of a game—especially if you want to get the best possible prices and avoid getting ripped off.

That’s because hotels and airlines have developed the lovel

2025. máj. 10. 10:20:03 | Fast company - tech
Uber staff revolts over return-to-office mandate

Uber is facing internal staff unrest as it attempts to implement a three-day-per-week return to office (RTO) mandate and stricter sabbatical eligibility. 

An all-hands meeting late

2025. máj. 10. 1:10:03 | Fast company - tech
Why ‘k’ is the most hated text message, according to science

A study has confirmed what we all suspected: “K” is officially the worst text you can send.

It might look harmless enough, but this single letter has the power to shut down a conversatio

2025. máj. 9. 22:40:05 | Fast company - tech