When a stock goes red we often hold the bag waiting for it to get back to zero (hopefully even some grains). This seems to be the common mentality. Wouldn’t it be a better idea to sell at a loss and put the funds into stocks performing better? Am I missing something where leaving it in the poorly performing stock is preferable?
I bought Google at the peak and despite some recent gains I’m still looking at -30%. Google’s performance before the big drop was typically 20% per year. Should I take the loss and invest in some better performing stocks? I have an M1 account I’ve been DCAing the last half a year that’s been doing well.
[link] [comments] https://www.reddit.com/r/stocks/comments/133bdtp/advice_for_the_changing_bags_we_hold/
Login to add comment
Other posts in this group
Please use this thread to discuss your portfolio, learn of other stock tickers, and help out users by giving constructive criticism.
Why quarterly? Public comp
When you sell a stock to buy another stock, do you prefer to set the estimated amount of the capital gains taxes aside in a money market or do you think it better to
Saving for retirement is crucial, but relying solely on a 401(k) might not be enough due to high inflation. Consider investing in growth stocks, especially in the tec
I’m think this is not a good investment as there is no chatter at all on the 52 week low. They are involved in a class action lawsuits by investors and credit card co
Sorry if this is the wrong sub. Let’s say I had $1 million in VOO but I wanted to sell half of it to buy SCHD. It would suck to pay taxes on $500k. So how would you g
Hey guys, I did a deep dive into Crocs. In this analysis, I will do a brief breakdown of the company and go over some quantitative data, qualitative data and estimate
