Ashley Abramson first came across Sophie Cress in a cold pitch to her work email. Cress was asking to be an expert source for any stories Abramson was working on as a freelance reporter. “I’ve got over 8 years of experience and qualifications in Psychology and Couples & Family Therapy, and I’m enthusiastic about exploring potential collaborations, especially in the areas of love, relationships, or LGBTQIA+ topics,” Cress wrote.
She provided a list of links to articles where she’d supposedly been featured as an expert. Her email address, linked to a website reviewing sex toys, caught Abramson’s attention. Then, when Abramson insisted that she could only conduct interviews over phone or video call, Cress ghosted.
In a recent investigation for Allure, Abramson dug deeper into Cress’s background and alleged qualifications. Turns out (surprise!), she doesn’t actually exist and was created by the Latvia-based owner of sex-toy-review site, Sexual Alpha, to boost traffic and improve the site’s search rankings.
Dainis Graveris, owner of Sexual Alpha, did not respond to Abramson’s requests for comment but Abramson decided to investigate further. She started by searching for evidence of a “Sophie Cress” or similar names licensed in North Carolina or holding the degrees and certifications Cress claimed. She found none. Abramson also discovered that Cress’s headshot was a stock image, and the woman pictured was not named Sophie Cress.
Most journalists contacted by Cress simply took her at face value, allowing her operators to dupe outlets from the Metro to the Daily Mail. As Abramson writes, “Of course, anyone could always claim to be anyone, and AI programs make it easy to generate a chunk of text that seems, at least at first skim, like it was written by an expert in any field you can think of.”
This is a classic case of what is commonly known as internet slop: scammy, AI-generated content that’s becoming increasingly widespread online and beyond. Some studies have even found that people rated AI-generated content more favorably than content actually created by humans (or at least can’t tell the difference).
This rising tide of slop only serves to further clog the internet, which is already drowning in misinformation. “While this is unlikely to be some sort of election-altering Russian disinformation campaign,” Abramson concludes, “I wouldn’t say it’s a sign of a particularly bright future.”
Connectez-vous pour ajouter un commentaire
Autres messages de ce groupe
Ever wonder how much energy it takes when you ask an AI to draft an em
It’s one of the great questions of our modern age: How does Sweetgreen lose money selling $14 (and up!) fast casual salads and bowls? And not just a little money but $442 million in the last three
Throughout 2023, the Biden administration persuaded a group of AI comp
In Silicon Valley boardrooms, a small group of executives is quietly making decisions that will shape the lives of billions. And most of us won’t know what those decisions are until it’s too late
In a bold, strategic move for the U.S., acting NASA Administrator Sean Duffy
Every CEO knows the feeling of promised features taking months longer than expected, simple changes breaking unrelated systems, and top engineers fighting fires more than they build the future. We
Daniel P. Johnson, a geographer at Indiana University at Indianapolis, works with a team of researchers who spend a lot of time catching blowflies, dissecting their iridescent blue-green abdomens,
