Fantasy and romance writers address AI controversies after readers discover prompts in published books

Two romantasy authors have publicly defended their use of artificial intelligence after being caught with AI-generated prompts left in their published works. While their readers are far from impressed, the writers insist that it does not take away from their craft.

Excerpts from novels published by K.C. Crowne and Lena McDonald have been spreading across Reddit, Goodreads, and Bluesky, after readers discovered revision notes that read like ChatGPT and cues that reference the style of other authors embedded in the copy. 

“I’ve rewritten the passage to align more with J. Bree’s style, which features more tension, gritty undertones, and raw emotional subtext beneath the supernatural elements,” reads what appears to be an editing note in chapter three of McDonald’s Darkhollow Academy: Year 2. (J Bree is also an author of romance and fantasy novels.) 

McDonald has since addressed the incident on the “About the author” section of her Amazon book page.

“The truth is, I used AI to help edit and shape parts of the book,” she wrote in a recent note. “As a full-time teacher and mom, I simply can’t afford a professional editor, and I turned to AI as a tool to help refine my writing,” adding, “my goal was always to entertain, not to mislead.”

Harmless brainstorming or active deception?

McDonald is not the only author who has been caught using AI prompts in recent months.

A top-ranked author on Amazon who writes under the name K.C. Crowne published a book called Dark Obsession in January, one of many dozens of titles under the author’s byline. However, it wasn’t long before screenshots from the mafia-romance novel began spreading with what appeared to be an AI prompt in the middle of the page. 

“Certainly! Here’s an enhanced version of your passage, making Elena more relatable and injecting additional humor while providing a brief, sexy description of Grigori,” the passage reads, according to a screenshot posted on Reddit.  

Crowne has seemingly responded to the accusations via her personal assistant’s Facebook account.

“I’ve recently started the practice of using AI to make very minor edits,” Crowne clarified according to a screenshot of a Facebook thread.

Crowne also wrote in an email to Futurism: “Earlier this year, I made an honest mistake. I accidentally uploaded the wrong draft file, which included an AI prompt. That error was entirely my responsibility, and that’s why I made the tough decision to address it publicly.”

She explained that she occasionally uses AI to “brainstorm” or to tackle “writer’s block” but that “every story I publish is fundamentally my own.” She also added, “I only use AI-assisted tools in ways that help me improve my craft while fully complying with the terms of service of publishing platforms, to the best of my ability.”

Fast Company has reached out to Crowne for comment. We could not find a contactable email address or public social media account for McDonald. 

New territory and fresh questions in an old industry

These incidents add fuel to the fire that has been raging about AI’s infiltration of creative fields.

When it comes to the major players in publishing, their position on AI is tentative. Penguin Random House’s AI approach champions human creativity and advocates for intellectual property, but adds “we will use generative AI tools selectively and responsibly, where we see a clear case that they can advance our goals.”

Meanwhile, Hachette UK opposes “machine creativity” but encourages “responsible experimentation with AI for operational uses” and recognizes “the benefits of remaining curious and embracing technology.”

In this new murky territory, if authors are turning to these AI tools for brainstorming, editing, or even drafting, is it their duty to disclose this to unsuspecting readers? Or is an author’s final seal of approval enough to claim the work as their own? That’s provided they have proofread the work and deleted any giveaways. 

https://www.fastcompany.com/91341390/ai-prompts-left-in-published-books-authors-respond-to-controversy?partner=rss&utm_source=rss&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=rss+fastcompany&utm_content=rss

Creată 2mo | 28 mai 2025, 14:10:08


Autentifică-te pentru a adăuga comentarii

Alte posturi din acest grup

$100,000, 100 streamers: IShowSpeed and Jynxzi’s Fortnite tournament is already drawing excitement

IShowSpeed and Jynxzi are teaming up to host a $100,000 Fortnite tournament, bringing together 100 top creators for what’s shaping up to be the biggest celebrity Fortnite match to date.

14 iul. 2025, 19:40:06 | Fast company - tech
Zuckerberg announces Meta’s new AI data centers for superintelligence

Mark Zuckerberg said on Monday that Meta Platforms would spend hundreds of billions of dollars to build several massive

14 iul. 2025, 19:40:05 | Fast company - tech
Meta’s massive data center bet is a direct challenge to OpenAI and Alphabet

Meta may not currently lead the race for AI superintelligence, but it&

14 iul. 2025, 19:40:04 | Fast company - tech
Antipasto-gate: How a $40 salad sparked viral small-town drama on TikTok

Southern small-town drama has made its way to TikTok. If you’re not familiar

14 iul. 2025, 19:40:03 | Fast company - tech
How Sega’s surprise Saturn launch backfired—and changed gaming forever

In May of 1995, the video game industry hosted its first major trade show. Electronic Entertainment Expo (E3) was designed to shine a spotlight on games, and every major player wanted to stand in

14 iul. 2025, 12:40:06 | Fast company - tech
What are ‘tokenized’ stocks, and why are trading platforms like Robinhood offering them?

Robinhood cofounder and CEO Vlad Tenev channeled Hollywood glamour last month in Cannes at an extravagantly produced event unveiling of the trading platform’s newest products, including a tokenize

14 iul. 2025, 12:40:05 | Fast company - tech