The U.S. Senate is expected to pass major online child safety reforms in a vote on Tuesday, although the legislation, which has drawn mixed reactions from the tech industry, faces an uncertain fate in the House of Representatives.
Two bills — the Children and Teens’ Online Privacy Protection Act and the Kids Online Safety Act, nicknamed COPPA 2.0 and KOSA — would need to pass in the Republican-controlled House, currently on recess until September, to become law.
The bills were approved by the Senate in a bipartisan procedural vote last week, with 86 senators supporting and just one opposing. Democrats control that chamber by a margin of 51-49 seats, while Republicans hold the House by 220-212.
COPPA 2.0 would ban targeted advertising to minors and data collection without their consent, and give parents and kids the option to delete their information from social media platforms.
Top U.S. social media platforms made an estimated $11 billion in advertising revenue from users younger than 18 in 2022, according to a Harvard study published last year.
KOSA would make explicit a “duty of care” that social media companies have when it comes to minors using their products, focusing on design of the platforms and regulation of the companies.
Executives at social media sites Snap Inc and X said at a congressional hearing in January that they supported KOSA, while Facebook and Instagram owner Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg and TikTok Chief Executive Shou Zi Chew said they disagreed with parts of it.
Tech industry groups and the American Civil Liberties Union have criticized the bill, saying that differing interpretations of harmful content could result in minors losing access to content related to vaccines, abortion or LGBTQ issues.
Senators amended the language of the bill in response to such concerns earlier this year, in part by limiting the enforcement responsibility of states’ attorneys general.
Josh Golin, executive director at Fairplay for Kids, a group that supports the bills, said KOSA requires companies to mitigate specific risks, such as content that promotes eating disorders.
“Obviously government officials can do things that are not legal, but this does not give government officials any legal basis for censorship,” he said.
—Moira Warburton and Jody Godoy, Reuters
Chcete-li přidat komentář, přihlaste se
Ostatní příspěvky v této skupině
Every so often, Microsoft design director Diego Baca boots up an old computer so he can play around with Windows 95 again.
Baca has made a hobby of assembling old PCs with new-in-box vin
Twitter cofounder Jack Dorsey is back with a new app that tracks sun exposure and vitamin D levels.
Sun Day uses location-based data to show the current UV index, the day’s high, and add
AI chatbot therapists have made plenty of headlines in recent months—s
The latest version of Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence chatbot Grok is echoing the views of its
When an emergency happens in Collier County, Florida, the
A gleaming Belle from Beauty and the Beast glided along the exhibition floor at last year’s San Diego Comic-Con adorned in a yellow corseted gown with cascading satin folds. She could bare
