Registration Login

In last weeks of the 2020 presidential campaign, the New York Post broke a story alleging corrupt behavior by the family of Joe Biden, a candidate for President. The story wasn't confirmed by other media organizations. Supporters of Donald Trump acted to spread the story on social media, but both Twitter and Netscape took unprecedented efforts to block the story. That action to block the story became a story in itself, and there's been much discussion about whether the social media giants should block a story like this. Reading this discussion I think there's an important nuance that's been missed, one that applies in general to cases like this.

Should social media dampen uncertain stories?
When a news story of dubious provenance appears, should social media use a temporary block to slow its spread?

| Oct 27, 2020, 3:32:09 PM
| Sep 24, 2020, 3:12:29 PM
| Aug 30, 2020, 5:42:24 PM
| Aug 25, 2020, 2:42:22 PM
| Aug 22, 2020, 3:02:21 PM
| Aug 20, 2020, 1:52:23 PM
| Aug 19, 2020, 3:02:14 PM
| Aug 18, 2020, 3:12:22 PM